Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 1
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 23, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Expressed concerns about whether the subdivision plat was filed with Westchester County and whether required geotechnical studies were completed.
Architectural Review Board - Sep 23, 2026 · 27:10 →Representing neighboring residents, he argued that SEQRA requires evaluating the entire action, including demolition and bedrock removal, rather than just the subdivision in isolation.
Planning Board - Jan 7, 2026 · 13:20 →Argued that three required environmental studies were never completed and asked the board to defer action until they are reinstated.
Planning Board - Jan 7, 2026 · 17:09 →Detailed strict state and federal regulations regarding asbestos, lead paint, and geotechnical testing for bedrock excavation during demolition.
Planning Board - Jan 7, 2026 · 20:22 →Criticized the developer's transparency and expressed deep concern over the project's impact on the neighborhood and nearby green space.
Planning Board - Jan 7, 2026 · 29:01 →Voiced strong opposition and affection for the existing home, noting community support for preserving local architectural heritage.
Planning Board - Jan 7, 2026 · 1:00:00 →Expressed severe concern about toxic mold in the vacant house and urged the board to inspect the property before allowing demolition.
Planning Board - Jan 7, 2026 · 1:01:40 →